Return to Rev.
Frank Hall's Sermons index.
Demands of the
Age on Our Chosen Faith
February 27, 2000
Reading: From Albert Camus, in his acceptance speech upon being awarded the
Nobel Prize for Literature, December 10, 1957
Probably every generation
sees itself as charged with remaking the world. Mine, however, knows it will
not remake the world. But its task is perhaps even greater, for it consists in
keeping the world from destroying itself.
As the heir of a corrupt history that blends blighted revolutions, misguided
techniques, dead gods and worn-out ideologies, in which second-rate powers can
destroy everything today but are unable to win anyone over and in which
intelligence has stooped to becoming the servant of hatred and oppression, that
generation, starting from nothing but its own negations, has had to
re-establish both within and without itself a little of what constitutes the
dignity of life and death.
Faced with a world threatened with disintegration, in which our grand
inquisitors may set up once and for all the kingdoms of death, that generation
knows that, in a sort of mad race against time, it ought to reestablish among
nations a peace not based on slavery, to reconcile labor and culture again, and
to reconstruct with all (people) an Ark of the Covenant.
Perhaps it can never accomplish that vast undertaking, but most certainly
throughout the world it has already accepted the double challenge of truth and
liberty and, on occasion, has shown that it can lay down its life without
hatred. That generation deserves to be acclaimed and encouraged wherever it
happens to be, and especially wherever it is sacrificing itself.
And to it, confident of your wholehearted agreement, I should like to transfer
the honor you have just done me.
Truth is mysterious, elusive, ever to be won anew. Liberty is dangerous, as
hard to get along with as it is exciting. We must progress toward those two
objectives, painfully but resolutely, sure in advance that we shall weaken and
flinch on such a long road.
I was a senior in high school
when Camu delivered this Nobel acceptance speech. Shortly afterward I set off
for college — a state college, a kind of continuation of public school,
established and maintained for working-class families. Tuition was $50 per
semester. Nearly all of us commuted, driving the old cars for which we paid $75
or $100 and insured for $60 a year.
In those days, for sons and
daughters of working class families, a college degree was a ticket on the train
of the American Dream.
Camus said that the charge of
his generation was to keep the world from destroying itself. He speculated that
'every generation sees itself as charged with remaking the world.'
There's a sense in which every
generation sees its task as keeping the world from destroying itself; it's
culture, it's heritage — the need to preserve the status quo, to keep
things from changing, is on the agenda of every generation.
What, then, is our charge?
What's on our agenda, now that we've entered this new, exciting, challenging,
confusing millennium?
I refer to the Unitarian
Universalist faith as our chosen faith, because most of us discovered it after
being brought up in some other faith system. Those who were brought up in the
Unitarian and/or Universalist faith (the two denominations merged in 1961 to
form the UUA) also make a choice — without the threat of hellfire or a
more personal, immediate condemnation — the choice to stay and to be
involved and to support, preserve and enhance this chosen faith of ours.
This is a faith we have chosen,
and must keep choosing, for it to be real, to be effective, to truly be ours.
We're here because this approach feels right for us.
So, what is required of us,
now? What are the demands of the age on our chosen faith?
First among them is the
perennial demand to affirm this faith of ours — this approach to
religion, spirituality, ethics or philosophy of life. To affirm it by
supporting it.
What I mean by 'affirming our
faith' is the antidote to taking it for granted, the way we might easily fall
into taking too many things for granted — the food we eat, the clothes we
wear, the cars we drive — the vacations we take and the educational
opportunities for ourselves and our children.
Another demand of the age on
our faith is to help make it the kind of place that promotes learning, that
encourages the moral life-that addresses social issues and the ethical dilemmas
we face individually and collectively.
Another perennial demand of the
age on our chosen faith is to avoid focusing too much on the negative —
too often we who have left another faith focus on what we do not believe rather
than affirming what we're about.
That was the central motivation
for the development of our statement of purposes and principles some years ago
— to say what we affirm: the inherent worth and dignity of every person;
justice equity and compassion in human relations; the right of conscience and
the use of the democratic process — and so forth.
Another perennial demand is to
avoid putting down other faiths. We can too easily fall into the negative
— and our chosen faith soon sounds like 'the one true religion,' an
aspect of religion many of us wanted to leave. We're not perfect. Emerson was
right: "There's a crack in everything."
We can offer our critique of
religious ideas — including those in our chosen faith. But our critique
should not be condescending.
Another demand of our age on
our chosen faith is that we learn about our history, that we understand and
appreciate where that came from — how this faith of ours depended on some
who were willing to sacrifice themselves on the altars of truth, justice and
freedom so that we could be here, saying what we believe, and not forced to say
what we don't believe.
We have to be careful of
suggesting, in whatever ways, that we're the chosen people — or the only
true religion — or the only intelligent approach to faith and
spirituality. We need to build in a corrective — to be self-critical. But
those are perennial demands on our chosen faith.
What's demanded of us that's
specific to our age?
One of the demands of our age
is to see the best in all the religions — without denying the prejudice,
bigotry, racism of places like Bob Jones University. We have entered an age of
globalization — we not only see that we're all one world, one humanity,
but we're connected through ever-increasing forms of communication systems.
Recently Thandeka spoke from
this pulpit about Michael Servetus, who was one of our important forebears.
Servetus was martyred, burned at the stake in Geneva during the Reformation by
John Calvin with his book, On the Errors of the Trinity.
I was somewhat pleased and
almost amused to read the plaque in the city of Geneva which apologizes for
this terrible deed. It's an acknowledgment of the failure of that age!
Many of us decided to sever
ties with the religion in which we grew up, in part because we learned about
the long, bloody trail left by those responsible for terrible deeds done 'in
the name of God,' or 'in defense of the Faith,' and so forth.
We're here, however, because we
acknowledge the need for a spiritual dimension in our own lives, and in the
lives of our children. We're here because we believe we can nurture
spirituality without a negative, sin-based theology.
Spirituality must not be an end
in itself. We're involved in the world, in the real, down-to-earth problems and
concerns of the world. That's why we affirm a woman's right to choose,
promoting family planning and sex education for our young people.
We do not agree with those who
turn sexuality into sin or who would limit the responsible control of
conception.
Universalist minister Hosea
Ballou put it well in the 18th century: "Where there is love no
disagreement does us harm; where there is not love no agreement does us any
good."
One of the demands of our age
on our chosen faith is that we become leaders in inter-faith work, that we help
the wider religious community to understand who we are, and what we're about
— the positive, life-affirming principles that are at our foundation.
The more we do that the more we
and they will see how similar we are, and, at our core, how we are really the
same, as moral agents in the world, and as compassionate persons in search of
truth and meaning in our lives.
We're here because we believe
in the need to nurture respect for the integrity of the individual. That kind
of nurturing is a life-long task.
On an individual, personal
level, what's demanded is that we keep working at the task of putting all the
pieces of our lives in place — to become whole persons.
To do so, we have to keep
digging!
Remember the story of La Loba,
the wolf woman, from Clarissa Pinkola Estes' wonderful book, Women Who Run With
the Wolves?
La Loba's assignment was to dig
into the desert sands to find old bones. You'll remember that when she found
the bones of a wolf which were perfectly preserved, she carried each bone back
to her cave and carefully reassembled them, until she found every one, and then
she sang over the bones.
After singing all night long
the bones took on flesh and fur and finally stood up and ran into the sunrise,
pausing for a second in the distance so that La Loba could see that the wolf
was transformed into a woman!
This is what we're doing
— we're digging into the sands of our past to reassemble the old bones so
that we can be transformed — and by so doing, so that we can be healers
and helpers in a world full of wounded and needing people. Each of us is
wounded, or broken, and in need of being made whole, again.
The demands of our age are
similar to the demands of previous ages — the demands on our faith during
the Reformation, and the enlightenment — the demands during our early
development as a growing nation with its high ideals — the demands on our
chosen faith during and leading up to the Civil War, and so forth.
Our forebears were there, and
they had a significant impact on those ages.
What's required of us, here in
Westport, serving a large portion of Fairfield County? In a recent speech on
'the future of community,' one of our members, Watts Wacker
said: "Westport is one of the few communities in the world that
could actually dictate not only its own future but indeed serve as a positive
model for defining how the future of other communities evolves."
We've been looking at the issue
of racial and cultural diversity — here in our congregation — and
'here in our hearts.'
One of the demands of our age
is that we take another, deeper look at issues of race — issues of
prejudice or narrowness, both as individuals and as a covenanted community of
faith.
We need to take seriously
Camu's suggestion that we 'reconcile labor and culture again, and reconstruct
with all people the Ark of the Covenant.
Remember, Camu was an
existentialist. He wasn't referring to the ark in which the ten commandments are
stored. He used the ark of the covenant as a metaphor for reconstructing that
which is sacred. To reconcile labor and culture is to pay attention to the
division of wealth and the issue of equity — who gets paid how much for
what they do? Some work full time for $6 an hour, taking home less than $200 a
week and are often among the so-called working poor. Some are paid salaries in
the millions by corporations that seem to care less and less about those who
perform the labor which allows them to make profits.
The question of money, values
and culture came to mind as we watched or heard about the television special
"Who Wants to Marry a Multimillionaire?"
In a strange, if not perverted
way, this show was a reminder of what is sacred — a reminder that there is
something sacred.
It is such an easy target I'm
reluctant to join the feeding frenzy of holy criticism.
Perhaps it's unnerving to be
reminded that we all want money, because we need it! We need enough money to
survive. And it would be nice to have enough money to feel a sense of security,
in spite of what Jesus said about not worrying about it, and the suggestion
that those who do worry about having enough money are somehow morally or
spiritually inferior. Even Gandhi and Mother Theresa needed and asked for
money, some of it accruing directly or indirectly to their personal survival
needs!
In addition to money, there are
three things that we all need: attention, acceptance and affection.
Who Wants to Marry a
Multimillionaire was more about those three things than it was about money.
The dozens of millionaire men
who applied to be the one to marry — and the 50 women who were finalists
— were looking for a moment in the sun — their 15 minutes, perhaps,
in a world where we feel more and more anonymous. We all need some attention,
hoping for affection, needing acceptance.
So each of the contestants
wanted to be chosen, but was afraid they would be!
Each wanted a secure
partnership, which requires a partner with security — or securities!
Let him or her who is without
those so-called sins cast the stones, and let the rest hush up!
I'm not defending that sad
spectacle, nor those who produced it. I'm glad it crashed and burned.
But it did and does raise
important questions — if we're not too busy shooting at such an easy
target.
The demands of the age on our
chosen faith, then, include the work we need to do, first of all, on ourselves,
as individuals. May this be a place where such work can be accomplished without
a big bag of guilt!
The demands of the age on our
chosen faith include work we need to do together, to be sure this is a
welcoming congregation, a place where gay, lesbian, bisexual, transsexual and
transgender persons feel welcome; a place which reflects the kind of diversity
in the larger community and a place that reflects our deep, true feelings of
love and genuine compassion for all.
The demands of the age on our
chosen faith require us to continue to work for racial and economic justice.
The next time you feel put out
by the attitude of a cashier who is making $6 an hour at Stop & Shop think
about what life is like for that person and the family he or she is trying to
support or to help support, taking home less than $200 a week for full time
work!
It's not a matter of feeling
guilty, or having to justify having a big piece of the pie — that guilt
and the inevitable defensiveness which follows will do neither them, you nor us
any good.
But our chosen faith demands
that we act as moral change agents, helping to make this a more just, a more
fair and equitable world.
We have a long way to go.
Carl Sandburg was an active,
supporting member of a Unitarian congregation. Much of his poetry points to the
demands of the age on our chosen faith — his poetry about the working
people, about the process of building and rebuilding cities and communities. It
seems appropriate to close with a passage from his Chicago poem Windy City:
Put the city up; tear the
city down;
put it up again; let us find a city.
Let us remember the little violet-eyed
man who gave all, praying, "Dig and
dream, dream and hammer, till
your city comes."
Every day the people sleep and the city dies;
every day the people shake loose, awake and
build the city again.
The city is a tool chest opened every day,
a time clock punched every morning,
a shop door, bunkers and overalls
counting every day.
The city is a balloon and a bubble plaything
shot to the sky every evening, whistled in
a ragtime jig down the sunset.
The city is made, forgotten, and made again,
trucks hauling it away haul it back
steered by drivers whistling ragtime
against the sunsets.
Every day the people get up and carry the city,
carry the bunkers and balloons of the city,
lift it and put it down.
Return to Rev.
Frank Hall's Sermons index.